[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4

To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:57:52 -0500
Cc: XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=NKxmvJx_oEpdeMtfU9ePv4ofG5PjCuh23RJ+A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTi=NKxmvJx_oEpdeMtfU9ePv4ofG5PjCuh23RJ+A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
On 3/23/11 9:36 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I've been running xfstests on ext4 and I always get annoying failures to 
>> umount:
>> 213 8s ... 31s
>> umount: /mnt/test/ext4: device is busy.
>>        (In some cases useful info about processes that use
>>         the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
>> post 198 mostly fails to umount as well.
>> and post 124 always fails to umount.
>> My server is Ubuntu 10.10, running kernel 2.6.38.
>> Is there any known issue about this? because I could find it on google
>> or on the XFS list.
> Hi All,
> Has anyone seen these failures when running xfstests on ext4?
> My test and scratch partitions are dedicated for xfstests.

I've not seen it, can you investigate with lsof etc?

They both work for me on a quick test, anyway, on a .38

What are you using for your partitions under test?

> Thanks,
> Amir.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>