| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39 |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:38:48 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110323111842.GA18267@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1300860870-15471-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110323111842.GA18267@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:18:42AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think we'll need the inode OOM fixes for .39, too. But if you need > some more time for them it's fine to wait for them for a while. They are not ready yet. When i have them sorted out, I'll post them as 2.6.39 candidates. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: xfs_trans_read_buf() should return an error on failure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | xfstests: failure to umount ext4, Amir Goldstein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |