xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [stable] [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3

To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [stable] [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.38-rc3
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:50:02 -0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <201102032302.31780.a.miskiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <201101311642.p0VGgXTS018851@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D482E21.5040803@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110203000757.GT11040@dastard> <201102032302.31780.a.miskiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of February 2011, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:00:33AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> > > On 11-01-31 11:42 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
> > > > Linus, please accept the following updates for XFS, for 2.6.38-rc3
> > > > (if it's not too late) or 2.6.38-rc4.
> > > > 
> > > > They are all fixes for bugs that have some pretty undesirable
> > > > consequences. 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > Are these bugs all new in 2.6.38, or should some of these fixes
> > > also go out to -stable for earlier revisions?
> > > >       xfs: fix dquot shaker deadlock
> > 
> > That's a regression, so maybe.
> 
> Definitely, xfs_fsr can hit this even few times a day (happened already).
> 
> Stable team, please include this one for 2.6.37.1:

Now queued up (it will make .2, sorry, not .1)

thanks,

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>