xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26?
From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:52:58 -0500
Cc: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Dann Frazier <dannf@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20110208224707.GF2559@dastard>
References: <iibmah$dlp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D49A35B.6030009@xxxxxxx> <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> <4D4ABEF7.7000400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110204000823.GW11040@dastard> <4D517FD2.5040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110208195256.GA25601@dastard> <4D51A0BC.6070201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D51A695.6060700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110208224707.GF2559@dastard>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20101008 Firefox/4.0b7pre SeaMonkey/2.1b1
Greetings Dave,

Dave Chinner wrote:
And no errors detected in the filesystem. Can you run the xfsdump
again to confirm that it fails on the same inode? If it doesņ then
it definitely seems like an alignment problem in the untrusted inode
lookup patches....

I got around to doing the recreate test just now. A larger trace file this time, but 
still crashed. Rebooted off of the -26 kernel and pulling a backup with "old 
faithful" kernel.

Please find the trace output here in zipped format:

http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/pub/ldsbackup.trace2.log.zip

I suppose this means that the "untrusted inode lookup patches" are further 
confirmed as missing? If so, any idea on how long it will take to receive an updated 
kernel with the xfs code corrections?

Sincerely,

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>