xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfstests: Speed up test 042

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfstests: Speed up test 042
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:30:09 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1295927937-20634-5-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1295927937-20634-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1295927937-20634-5-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aelder@xxxxxxx
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:58 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> test 042 generates a worst-case fragmented filesystem and uses it to
> test xfs_fsr. It uses small 4k files to generate the hole-space-hole
> pattern that fragments free space badly. It is much faster to
> generate the same pattern by creating a single large file and
> punching holes in it.  Also, instead of writing large files to
> create unfragmented space, just use preallocation so we don't have
> to write the data to disk.
> 
> These changes reduce the runtime of the test on a single SATA drive
> from 106s to 27s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Perhaps your test system is configured different
from mine, but I don't see the speedup you see.
In fact, it might have slowed it down.  I really
haven't experimented much though and will report
back if I find anything more constructive to say.

Other than that I see no problem with the change.
And the difference either way isn't a big deal
to me, so:

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>