xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount

To: David Rees <drees76@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount
From: Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:22:18 -0500
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinO1JsX_3NDHS=ew5u2C7VcCHT1Y1Yabnz=RQLO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4D40C8D1.8090202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard> <4D40EB2F.2050809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D418B57.1000501@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101271040000.31246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D419765.4070805@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D41CA16.8070001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D41EA04.7010506@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110128001735.GO21311@dastard> <4D421A68.9000607@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinO1JsX_3NDHS=ew5u2C7VcCHT1Y1Yabnz=RQLO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
On 11-01-27 11:14 PM, David Rees wrote:
>
> As suggested before - why are you messing with AGs instead of allocsize?

Who said "instead of"?  I'm using both.

Cheers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>