| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount |
| From: | Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:59:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20110127234152.GN21311@dastard> |
| References: | <4D40C8D1.8090202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard> <4D40EB2F.2050809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D418B57.1000501@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110127234152.GN21311@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 11-01-27 06:41 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:12:23AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: .. >> Can you recommend a good set of mkfs.xfs parameters to suit the >> characteristics >> of this system? > > http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_I_want_to_tune_my_XFS_filesystems_for_.3Csomething.3E That entry says little beyond "blindly trust the defaults". But thanks anyway (really). > And perhaps you want to consider the allocsize mount option, though > that shouldn't be necessary for 2.6.38+... That's a good tip, thanks. >From my earlier posting: > /dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/mythtv type xfs > (rw,noatime,allocsize=64M,logbufs=8,largeio) Maybe that allocsize value could be increased though. Perhaps something on the order of 256MB might do it. Thanks again! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/8] xfs: candidate 2.6.38-rc fixes V3, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Mark Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |