xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: My current xfs-for-2.6.38 tree....

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: My current xfs-for-2.6.38 tree....
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:48:44 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110104064612.GK15179@dastard>
References: <20110104050259.GH15179@dastard> <20110104055441.GA9870@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110104064612.GK15179@dastard>
Reply-to: aelder@xxxxxxx
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:46 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:54:41AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:02:59PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > > 
> > > FYI, my current xfs-for-2.6.38 tree has just been updated. Changes
> > > since last update:
> > > 
> > >   - dropped the per-cpu superblock counter cleanup patches
> > >     from it so we can get it right before merging.
> > >   - added unaligned aio/dio write fix series (needs review)
> > >   - added log covering idle fix (needs review)
> > >   - added superblock write error hang fix (needs review)
> > > 
> > > The tree can be found here (when the rsync updates git.kernel.org):
> > 
> > I'll try to get to review the new patches, but can we please get the
> > metadata scalability patches into the xfs tree and thus linux-next ASAP?
> > The merge window is about to open, and we really need to get that stuff
> > in now.
> 
> That's all first in the branch and reviewed, so Alex should be able
> to simply merge up to the last commit in that part of the series from
> the branch I posted.
> 
> Alex, if you want I can set up a separate branch for the metadata
> scalability series....

No that's OK, I'll take in everything that's reviewed
and ready to go and leave the rest for later.  I've been
waiting for a pull request but this is fine with me.

                                        -Alex

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>