|Subject:||Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it|
|From:||Richard Scobie <r.scobie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:47:42 +1300|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:220.127.116.11) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9|
Emmanuel Florac wrote: > However, a reliable RAID-5 is probably safer than an experimental > RAID-6 overall.Looking at the 18.104.22.168 kernel running on this machine, the only md RAID mode marked as experimental is RAID-10.
I have no experience using Xen, but have used md RAID6 extensively in heavily loaded situations for over three years without problems.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Stan Hoeppner|
|Next by Date:||Re: xfssyncd and disk spin down, Stan Hoeppner|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it, Emmanuel Florac|
|Next by Thread:||[PATCH 1/5] percpu_counter: fix test in __percpu_counter_add_unless_lt(), Alex Elder|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|