xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:29:26 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20101223195544.53d45f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222175611.1c7d5190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D124B71.9030401@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223012655.2681c596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221928050.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223005630.GJ4907@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012230442150.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012231304130.12482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223195544.53d45f0b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Emmanuel Florac wrote:

Le Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:06:10 -0500 (EST) vous écriviez:

http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html


Please check the updated page:
http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html

Using a partition shows a slight degredation in the re-write speed but
an increase in performance for sequential output and input with the mode
set to perform.  Looks like this is what I will be using as it is the fastest
speeds overall except for the rewrite.

Thanks!

Justin.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>