xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:06:10 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012230442150.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222175611.1c7d5190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D124B71.9030401@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223012655.2681c596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221928050.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223005630.GJ4907@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012230442150.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Justin Piszcz wrote:


Hi,

How come parted using (optimal at 1mb alignment is slower than no partition? In addition, sunit and swidth set properly as mentioned earlier
appears to be _slower_ than defaults with no partitions.


http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html

Justin.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>