| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: untangle phase1 vs phase2 recovery helpers |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:06:23 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101201220710.647499265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20101201220620.340188389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101201220710.647499265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:06:24PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Dispatch to a different helper for phase1 vs phase2 in > xlog_recover_commit_trans > instead of doing it in all the low-level functions. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Good cleanup. That'll make it much easier to work out how to shoe-horn in item readahead to try to minimise log recovery times for large logs... Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_commit_trans, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 1/5] percpu_counter: fix test in __percpu_counter_add_unless_lt(), Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 4/4] xfs: untangle phase1 vs phase2 recovery helpers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] log recovery cleanups, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |