| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:50:05 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221234310.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222170620.GA29117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221209150.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222173209.GA29291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221234310.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:35:46PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Is this by specifying the sunit/swidth? yes > Can you elaborate on which paramters you modified? i set both to match what the hw raid was doing, the lru that is my brain doesn't have the detail anymore sorry at a guess it was probably something like 64k chunk, 20 devices wide the metadata performance difference between wrong and right is quite noticable > Yes and have it set to perform(ance). be sure you have a bbu, there is a setting for force wc --- i wouldn't do that i would have it wc when the battery is good automatically disable it when it's bad i was able to buffer ~490MB of writes in the card without trying hard, that's a lot of pain to get corrupted > Going to be using 19HDD x 3TB Hiatchi 7200RPMs, (18HDD RAID-6 + 1 > hot spare). are those 4k sector drives? i ask because it's not clear if/how the raid fw deals with these |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |