| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? |
| From: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:10:06 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101222170620.GA29117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222170620.GA29117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Chris Wedgwood wrote: if using hw raid teach mkfs about the array geom, that coupled with inode64 made a huge difference in performance that last time i did this When I had used XFS in the past on a 3ware 9650SE-16ML with 1TB HDDs I did not notice any performance difference on whether you set the su/swidth/etc. Do you have an example/of what you found? Is it dependent on the RAID card? Justin. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |