| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problem with XFS on USB 2TB HD |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:55:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | Kevin Richter <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101220045126.GK5193@dastard> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <4D0C9A4F.4040108@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101220001024.GH5193@dastard> <4D0EC5C5.2070407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101220045126.GK5193@dastard> |
Le Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:51:26 +1100 vous écriviez:
> <shrug>
>
> Who knows how the encryption algorithm (sha256) is encrypting
> blocks.
According to Wikipedia, the block size is 512.
> FWIW, encryption makes any sort of corruption below the encrypted
> layer much, much worse as it turns things like single bit media
> errors into undecipherable, unrecoverable blocks of noise. No
> filesystem can recover from such corruption of an encrypted device.
> Hence if you had the same problem on ex3, ext4, JFS, etc you will
> end up with the same mess (or worse).
That's why I have an unencrypted local backup and an encrypted remote
one :)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem with XFS on USB 2TB HD, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Question regarding xfs_repair / memory requirement., Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem with XFS on USB 2TB HD, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Problem with XFS on USB 2TB HD, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |