[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstests: fix 108 through config mechanism

To: Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstests: fix 108 through config mechanism
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:17:13 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1292338417.3296.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1291905612.3196.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101210143717.GB1415@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1292338417.3296.57.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:53:37PM +0100, Boris Ranto wrote:
> I didn't like it much either but I found it quite easy to implement with 
> quite high probability of future usage.
> I found the following modification sufficient although I'm not sure I put the 
> _filter_spaces in right place (I'd say it's quite universal so it could find 
> a usage in other cases):

This patch looks good to me.  Can you resent it in the correct format:

 - a descriptive subject
 - mail body containing a short explanation, than the signed-off-by
   line, then the actual patch.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>