xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: performance

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS: performance
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:38:55 +0100
Cc: Yclept Nemo <orbisvicis@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=-y0v4MzyU+qWPmvazouDu0N3gqSvVTU1z4Gke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <AANLkTi=u8dX0ehPN3Rv3FQ+84htY3AYEv0eboGgC7_qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikw086Z_66cz_U-EdFQx14TXP6XmiG-KyLN4BLo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=-y0v4MzyU+qWPmvazouDu0N3gqSvVTU1z4Gke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Montag, 29. November 2010 Yclept Nemo wrote:
>   -If not, are there any reasons to nonetheless prefer
> xfsdump/xfsrestore over rsync?

Just do an rsync. As this copies data new, XFS can arrange them in order 
anyway. No need for special tools.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
// 
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>