| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: performance |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:38:55 +0100 |
| Cc: | Yclept Nemo <orbisvicis@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <AANLkTi=-y0v4MzyU+qWPmvazouDu0N3gqSvVTU1z4Gke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <AANLkTi=u8dX0ehPN3Rv3FQ+84htY3AYEv0eboGgC7_qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikw086Z_66cz_U-EdFQx14TXP6XmiG-KyLN4BLo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=-y0v4MzyU+qWPmvazouDu0N3gqSvVTU1z4Gke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Montag, 29. November 2010 Yclept Nemo wrote: > -If not, are there any reasons to nonetheless prefer > xfsdump/xfsrestore over rsync? Just do an rsync. As this copies data new, XFS can arrange them in order anyway. No need for special tools. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 // ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** // http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // // Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: only run xfs_error_test if error injection is active, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use generic per-cpu counter infrastructure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: performance, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/5] xfs: fixes for 2.6.37-rcX, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |