| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:18:19 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <4CEC5E15.7080307@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <4CEAC412.9000406@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101123234811.0ea3c41c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEC5E15.7080307@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Mittwoch, 24. November 2010 Spelic wrote: > What would be the advantage of using hardware raid? Better broken drive detection (hw raid controllers are more picky than linux), server CPU offload, out-of-band notification of problems, and broken disks don't lead to a non-bootable system - what if your boot disk crashes? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 // ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** // http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // // Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TRUNG TÃM NGOáI NGá - DáCH THUáT, Huong Huflit |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |