| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Improving XFS file system inode performance |
| From: | Jesse Stroik <jstroik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:49:35 -0600 |
| Cc: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20101122234419.GK13830@dastard> |
| References: | <4CEAE7D7.6050401@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101122232528.21b78a9e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEAEF66.7030708@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101122234419.GK13830@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
Dave,Thanks. This is precisely what I was looking for. I'll let you know how it turns out. As this file system is likely to continue to increase in number of files at a fairly rapid rate, we're going to need a long term strategy. I suspect it may be necessary in the near future to double or quadruple the memory to 32GB or 64GB, but the uncertainty in the formula makes me nervous. For a situation like this, it would be ideal if we could specify an inode cache size. Thanks, Jesse |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] xfsrestore: mmap dirent names for faster lookups, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Improving XFS file system inode performance, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Improving XFS file system inode performance, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Improving XFS file system inode performance, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |