xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: reducing imaxpct on linux

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: reducing imaxpct on linux
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:06:20 +0100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "CZEH, Istvan" <iczeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4CDDC2E0.3060000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <1289561141.20961.24.camel@sekli> <201011121618.09040@xxxxxx> <4CDDC2E0.3060000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.5-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Freitag, 12. November 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I don't think that follows; when you mount with inode64, inodes can
> be allocated anywhere.  Even if you previously mounted without it.
> 
> What is required, though, is some contiguous space to allocate an
> inode cluster into.  That could be the problem.

In his first mail, the OP said there are 9TB free space. I can't believe 
that space would be so scattered that you can't find a free space for 
new inodes.

BTW: What size requirement is there for contig. inode space?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
// 
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>