[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_repair of critical volume

To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_repair of critical volume
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:19:38 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CDDBC5C.7020708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <75C248E3-2C99-426E-AE7D-9EC543726796@xxxxxxxx> <4CCD3CE6.8060407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <864DA9C9-B4A4-4B6B-A901-A457E2B9F5A5@xxxxxxxx> <201011121422.28993@xxxxxx> <4CDDBC5C.7020708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:14:52 -0600 vous écriviez:

> This isn't "robustness" Michael.  If anything it's a serious problem.

I beg to disagree. Would it be better if instead of still having some
of the data, everything was lost? At what level of accidental
destruction do you think that the whole data set should be made
unavailable? 10%? 5? 1? 

Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>