----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> . . .
> > > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
> > > but I seem to have missed them. In the future please
> > > send this sort of thing to the list for review.
> > They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps
> > caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that?
> OK, I think I found the problem. You are sending to
> "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" and I'm not on that list.
Nope, I'm using xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx I have a vague, distant
memory of some list magic Russell setup years ago on oss,
to remap linux-xfs@ (old school) to xfs@ (which was voted
most popular name of the time).
> I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx", which seems
> to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
> list. Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
> it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.
This discussion was had years ago, comes up every few years,
& FWIW I don't really care where the list lives... think we
all have more useful things to be doing. :)