xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:03:26 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <120112634.29711289446960016.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <120112634.29711289446960016.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aelder@xxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote:
. . .
> > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
> > but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
> > send this sort of thing to the list for review.
> 
> They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps
> caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that?

OK, I think I found the problem.  You are sending to
"linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" and I'm not on that list.
I wasn't even aware of it.  Something in majordomo
still shows Jim Mostek as having some sort of
ownership for that list (which would be at least 10
year old information).

I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx", which seems
to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
list.  Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.

                                        -Alex


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>