[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:32:10 -0600
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <477680717.25681289427570428.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <477680717.25681289427570428.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aelder@xxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 10:53 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex?
> > 
> > I wanted to update them and re-post and get
> > an actual review this time.
> > 
> > I can get that done with a few hours effort.
> > What is your time frame?  I'm in the middle of a
> > few things right now but can move this to the
> > front of my queue if you're short on time.
> Ideally we'd get a release out asap for Debian folks,
> as the upgrade issue is biting quite a few people.  If
> the metadump stuff needs more time, doing a subsequent
> release with that is a fine option too... lemme know.
> Since Debian is moving toward a (distro) release, the
> less change we're putting into this release, the better
> - so, my vote would be to hold off on further changes
> till next time, but up to you.

Fine with me.  The metadump stuff doesn't need much time
but I don't mind marking a release without it.  Push your
changes to the xfsprogs-dev tree and I'll put together
the release first thing tomorrow.

I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time
but I seem to have missed them.  In the future please
send this sort of thing to the list for review.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>