Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window

[Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > My tree is currently based on the VFS locking changes I have out for review,
> > so there's a couple fo patches that won't apply sanely to a mainline or OSS 
> > xfs
> > dev tree. See below for a pointer to a git tree with all the patches in it.
> 
> The only think that should depend on it are the inode hash changes.  I
> suspect it might be a better idea if we feed those via Al together with
> the VFS scalability bits, and only feed the rest through the XFS tree to
> avoid having nasty dependencies.

Yes, sounds reasonable.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx