xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:21:10 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20101108141746.GA15588@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101108141746.GA15588@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > My tree is currently based on the VFS locking changes I have out for review,
> > so there's a couple fo patches that won't apply sanely to a mainline or OSS 
> > xfs
> > dev tree. See below for a pointer to a git tree with all the patches in it.
> 
> The only think that should depend on it are the inode hash changes.  I
> suspect it might be a better idea if we feed those via Al together with
> the VFS scalability bits, and only feed the rest through the XFS tree to
> avoid having nasty dependencies.

Yes, sounds reasonable.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>