Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> My tree is currently based on the VFS locking changes I have out for review,
> so there's a couple fo patches that won't apply sanely to a mainline or OSS 
> xfs
> dev tree. See below for a pointer to a git tree with all the patches in it.

The only think that should depend on it are the inode hash changes.  I
suspect it might be a better idea if we feed those via Al together with
the VFS scalability bits, and only feed the rest through the XFS tree to
avoid having nasty dependencies.