xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:17:46 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> My tree is currently based on the VFS locking changes I have out for review,
> so there's a couple fo patches that won't apply sanely to a mainline or OSS 
> xfs
> dev tree. See below for a pointer to a git tree with all the patches in it.

The only think that should depend on it are the inode hash changes.  I
suspect it might be a better idea if we feed those via Al together with
the VFS scalability bits, and only feed the rest through the XFS tree to
avoid having nasty dependencies.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>