| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:25:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1289206519-18377-12-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1289206519-18377-12-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> +/* > + * buffer types > + */ > +#define B_FS_DQUOT 1 > +#define B_FS_AGFL 2 > +#define B_FS_AGF 3 > +#define B_FS_ATTR_BTREE 4 > +#define B_FS_DIR_BTREE 5 > +#define B_FS_MAP 6 > +#define B_FS_INOMAP 7 > +#define B_FS_AGI 8 > +#define B_FS_INO 9 Is there any good reason to keep/reintroduce the buffer types? In this series we're only using the refcounts, and I can't see any good use for the types either. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 07/18] xfs: don't use vfs writeback for pure metadata modifications, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: reduce the number of AIL push wakeups, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |