[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS journaling position

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS journaling position
From: Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:32:11 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1010271011510.27409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <31c7e56286d37870011c17ee8e002760.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101025161052.GC19425@xxxxxxx> <201010270027.26687@xxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1010271011510.27409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Robert Brockway wrote:

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Michael Monnerie wrote:

in an area where disks are slower than on the outside. And if you fill
only half of the partition, it means your log is totally on the end of
the disk, access-wise.

Hi Michael.  Ignoring LVM for a moment...

*Sigh*. I meant to go on to point out that LVM further abstracts away the hardware making it even harder to establish where the fastest part of the physical disk is.

Similarly virtual hosts have little chance of trying to establish the physical nature of the device holding their filesystems.



Email: robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx         Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode)
Web: http://www.practicalsysadmin.com
Contributing member of Software in the Public Interest (http://spi-inc.org/)
Open Source: The revolution that silently changed the world

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>