| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1 |
| From: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:22:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101027121240.4e8ca83a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4CC67450.9020602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC6B56B.7020007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101026132505.6af29d5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201010270124.44846@xxxxxx> <20101027080454.31a59a3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC7CDF6.3080405@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101027120628.7b4b2e20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC7FA39.4030502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101027121240.4e8ca83a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9 |
> Yes, the initiator values are more important here. Basically, the > iscsitarget service should transmit the initiator's requests as they > come. What do you mean by this sentence? Sorry no native english speaker. Am 27.10.2010 12:12, schrieb Emmanuel Florac: Le Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:08:57 +0200 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG<s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:I'm having 2.6.32 Kernel not 2.6.23 :-) Upgrade works fine yesterday. OK your values are for the iscsi_target right? Should i use the SAME values on the iscsi connector side?Yes, the initiator values are more important here. Basically, the iscsi target service should transmit the initiator's requests as they come. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |