xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1

To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1
From: Larsen, Tore Høivaag <tore.hoivaag.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:30:22 +0100
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4CC6B56B.7020007@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4CC67450.9020602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101026092205.086c0d89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC68249.7050409@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101026094111.48670eb7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC688FE.7010206@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101026130103.7cc43aec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<4CC6B56B.7020007@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Act0/upegym7m5WGT+S/kv2tdx8zkwAAD33h
Thread-topic: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1
You should keep the driver and firmware ins sync wither kernel.  Choose e.g. 
latest 9.4.3 iso for 2.6.9, and 9.5.3 for RHEL5/SLES11/Fedora13. Do not use 
9.5.3 firmware with RHEL4/SLES10 native driver. If I remeber correctly 
tw_update doesn't even let you mix a downgrade driver with new firmware, and 
vs.versus.

Iow, If you are on a legacy level, stay with latest legacy 9.4.3 for it.   

http://kb.lsi.com/KnowledgebaseArticle14546.aspx

I've use a lot of 9550SXU and 9650SE and various MegaRaid. I find 3ware much 
easier to work with and better performing with xfs.


//seisqc1> /c2 show all
/c2 Driver Version = 2.26.08.003-2.6.18RH
/c2 Model = 9550SXU-8LP
/c2 Available Memory = 112MB
/c2 Firmware Version = FE9X 3.08.00.029


Rgds,
--ToreL

________________________________________
From: xfs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [xfs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefan 
Priebe - Profihost AG [s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 1:03 PM
To: Emmanuel Florac
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1

Hi,

it is a 9650SE-8LPML with Firmware: FE9X 3.06.00.003.

So you mean i should upgrade to 4.x Firmware? Do i then have to do a
filesystem repair? Or just wait if the error accours again?

Stefan

Am 26.10.2010 13:01, schrieb Emmanuel Florac:
> Le Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:53:34 +0200
> Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG<s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  écrivait:
>
>> No it is a Raid 5 (3Ware Controller).
>
> What model? Which firmware? If it's a 96x0 model, notice that 4.x.x
> firmwares added lots of performance enhancements and solved many
> problems.
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>