xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Test Results Interpretation

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS Test Results Interpretation
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:06:16 +0200
In-reply-to: <4CC5894D.6090409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <3C5E029826A0704DB5998577FCFF46F0095A278CEB@dagobah> <4CC5894D.6090409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.4-desktop; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Montag, 25. Oktober 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Kernel:  2.6.18-128.el5
> 
> You need a much newer kernel.  2.6.18 is ancient released in 2006,
> though CentOS have patched the bejesus out of it--128 times.

Oh, I didn't look at that.

2.6.18 is a performance killer compared to an actual 2.6.36 kernel. 
There's been so much work in between. If you can, try a 2.6.36 and 
compare your performance. Everything will be a lot faster than with 
2.6.18. You don't need to fiddle with mkfs/mount options, just upgrade 
the kernel and without any other tuning you will be much faster than 
before.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>