| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Implementing checksums in XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:45:07 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201010222255.40861@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <4CC14C1B.5060409@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101022124928.GA16437@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201010222255.40861@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:55:40PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > Oh that would be very welcome. A "secure" filesystem sounds really good, > especially if it's fast as XFS is :-) > I'd implement it everywhere immediately as soon as it's available. Will > existing XFS's be upgradeable in some way other that backup/restore? checksumming inodes and btree nodes means larger data structures for those, so no there's no upgrade path available. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: bad clientid on recovery on MIPS (VIPT cache), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: use a common _filter_test_dir function, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Implementing checksums in XFS, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Cloud computing fundamentals, Laura Wood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |