[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Best filesystems ?

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Best filesystems ?
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:27:59 +0200
In-reply-to: <19651.9652.631329.903552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <4CBE2403.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010211258070.24449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19651.9652.631329.903552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Samstag, 23. Oktober 2010 Peter Grandi wrote:
> * Reiser3 is nice with the right parameters for the few cases
>   where there is a significant number of small files on a small
>   storage system accessed by a single process.

I still use reiser3 for all servers root filesystems, it's very good for 
that. Never had a problem. 

For anything else I use XFS for performance reasons. Except for my KDE 
/home partition, that stays on reiserfs because KDE seems to rely on 
O_PONIES and crashes lead to zero size config files which is not a lot 
of fun.

mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>