| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Best filesystems ? |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:47:14 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010211258070.24449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4CBE2403.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101019234217.GD12506@dastard> <19646.55189.843933.481529@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101021020009.GG12506@dastard> <19648.27859.799400.168394@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010211258070.24449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 |
Andrew Daviel put forth on 10/21/2010 3:06 PM: > Has someone documented (recently, and correctly) what filesystems (XFS, > ext3, ext4, reiser, JFS, VFAT etc.) are best for what tasks (mailboxes, > database, general computing, video streaming etc.) ? http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2.6.35-rc5/2.6.35-rc5/ That's the most recent set of tests I'm aware of. The testing was performed against an IBM DS4500 with 136 drives in a multilevel combo hardware/software stripe setup. Complete hardware description and test details are here: http://btrfs.boxacle.net/ -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: do not call attr/getfattr/setfattr direcly, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Quote needed..., Thomas Patterson |
| Previous by Thread: | Best filesystems ?, Andrew Daviel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Best filesystems ?, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |