| To: | pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question/Problem: Mounting of XFS filesystem takes a lot of time |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:05:42 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <19647.34574.786118.56593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <1287593846.2338.5.camel@nukebox> <19647.34574.786118.56593@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:19:26 +0100 vous écriviez:
> Usually SATA drives are pogrammed to do a large number of firmware
> driven retries in case of data errors, hanging the IO subsystem,
This is only the case for Desktop SATA drives. More expensive
"enterprise" SATA drives (Seagate ES or ES2 series, Hitachi Ultrastar,
etc) behave like SAS drives.
Desktop SATA drives also lack the logic to manage properly vibrations
happening in large arrays, which can totally kill performance.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: avoid mbox file fragmentation, Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.36-rc8-95-g39dc948, xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question/Problem: Mounting of XFS filesystem takes a lot of time, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | avoid mbox file fragmentation, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |