| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: avoid mbox file fragmentation |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:03:19 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20101019234217.GD12506@dastard> |
| References: | <4CBE2403.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101019234217.GD12506@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
Dave Chinner put forth on 10/19/2010 6:42 PM: > I've explained how allocsize works, and that speculative allocation > gets truncated away whenteh file is closed. Hence is the application > is doing: > > open() > seek(EOF) > write() > close() I don't know if it changes anything in the sequence above, but Dovecot uses mmap i/o. As I've said, I'm not a dev. Just thought this could/might be relevant. Would using mmap be compatible with physical preallocation? -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: avoid mbox file fragmentation, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question/Problem: Mounting of XFS filesystem takes a lot of time, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: avoid mbox file fragmentation, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: avoid mbox file fragmentation, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |