[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Filename Hash and metadump

To: aelder@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS Filename Hash and metadump
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:28:33 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1286290547.1960.3.camel@doink>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <1286290547.1960.3.camel@doink>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010 Alex Elder wrote:
> PS  Two more observations:
>     - There is really no need for the characters to be truly random.
>       Making the generated name unique and different from the
>       original is sufficient.  So (with the exception of the last
>       five bytes) we can select the characters however we like.
>       They could be a sequential series of names, for example,
>       rather than computing a random value for each.

I was thinking the same when reading your description. Why not simply 
"number" the file names from 1 to whatever count of files/dirs there is 
within that dir?

mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>