| To: | Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mm: xfs lockdep warning |
| From: | Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 2010 20:09:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yang Ruirui <ruirui.r.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rhPNnOHaczzwzZSAJXJCD4FvRX4P2yrS0Ew3yeVK1F0=; b=cJR4zw1rTetEw2KOQEPj0JDj4aQ60z9GT+YgDPtAcENFabO+bYMtJfv+rMyhK7X3V4 Qcol8a1OlF4oF3bIzOZl4PCrV7JdESGqRChsP93YUeTpS+5z/Mk4b0V7l8z6mx3JaXQG H+bDGidQVo7Oio0lCh6gKI9SJTUxfxB7ms4EM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZBBXxKBzat+pE1A4vm7kjGnT7UYRTR6/cVhBQhkTSBr7sTe6gxbblhbQ8AzcUBpXFM QZ6NV6GZnYgWIZijA7dQxp5pGxaA0MQa1u12NPUcsRbASEitSduVEg8PXft4q1kfi2PM PF9I3Z9Ja8c0OBr8XIgra297q+8sZc/VCefqo= |
| In-reply-to: | <4CAB5874.9060106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <201009161546.16909.ruirui.r.yang@xxxxxxxxx> <20100917005227.GJ24409@dastard> <20100920191355.GA28443@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=45J+=ytj=NC4bYTVJFRakNQQiFd35K7mrf+Gq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CA997DF.5030008@xxxxxxxxxx> <20101004092107.GJ4681@dastard> <AANLkTi=3jjoCtYoK0endt8OM=omygO284WN2ZQZ=jceo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CAB5779.5020901@xxxxxxxxxx> <4CAB5874.9060106@xxxxxxxxxx> |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/05/2010 06:51 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On 10/05/2010 12:09 PM, Torsten Kaiser wrote: >>> 2) the hang with 2.6.35-rc5 I have seen twice (triggered probably by >>> high load while building KOffice on an tmpfs) >> >> The trace doesn't seem to firmly point at xfs locking up. There are >> md and dm crypt involved. Are you sure this is locking up inside xfs? >> Also, can you please enable frame pointers so that we can get more >> reliable backtrace? >> >>> 3) the lockdep issue that started this thread and that I am seeing in >>> mainline 2.6.36-rc5 and -rc6 and that seems to be rather easy to >>> trigger for me. >>> >>> Because 3) is regarded as a false positive, it should not be the cause >>> of 2) >> >> For now, let's not draw any conclusion or mix the issues. I'll look >> up the original thread and look into what the lockdep warning means. > > Ah, okay, David already looked into it and concluded it to be a > spurious one. Can you please attach full kernel message of the > lockup? Here is the complete log from bootup until the hang happened the second time. I just logged into KDE and then started the upgrade of KOffice, which meant that the package manager started to compile 4 programs each with -j5. After a few minutes the load got to ~18 and probably at the point where filecache and GCCs filled up my 4GB RAM the system got stuck. The mouse so longer moved and SysRq+S did not work. The log was captured via serial console on a second system. I will try tomorrow with frame pointers enabled... Torsten
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | New Retained Executive Search, Ron E. Bates |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mm: xfs lockdep warning, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mm: xfs lockdep warning, Tejun Heo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mm: xfs lockdep warning, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |