[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: Inconsistent lock state

To: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: Inconsistent lock state
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:25:31 +1100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20101004224830.GJ30524@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20101004224830.GJ30524@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:48:30PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Out of the blue, while running postfix+mailscanner:

False positive - reclaim will never be attempting to lock an active
inode. IIRC The page cache allocation in .36 now uses GFP_NOFS, so
this should go away when you update to a newer kernel.


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>