| To: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:25:31 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20101004224830.GJ30524@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20101004224830.GJ30524@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:48:30PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote: > Out of the blue, while running postfix+mailscanner: > False positive - reclaim will never be attempting to lock an active inode. IIRC The page cache allocation in .36 now uses GFP_NOFS, so this should go away when you update to a newer kernel. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state, Simon Kirby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Come and see the new web site dedicated to the contemporary art promotion., News Pears Gallery |
| Previous by Thread: | 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Come and see the new web site dedicated to the contemporary art promotion., News Pears Gallery |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |