Richard Sharpe, on 09/25/2010 06:18 PM wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Le Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:46:51 +0200 vous écriviez:
>>
>>> I C that there is no problem with IETD ;-)
>>> But we need to stay focused on SCST in this case :-)
>>>
>>
>> Yes but you'd need to get sure that it's not scst that breaks the
>> filesystem. My guess : it actually is. *I personnally didn't find SCST
>> of acceptable production quality.*
When did you try the last time?
I guess, all you need is the latest 2.0.0.x SCST SVN branch? Or wait a
bit for official 2.0 release.
Vlad
|