| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS errors on large Infiniband fileserver setup |
| From: | Christian Herzog <horeizo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:52:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20100923103802.GA16984@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <29252416bd0d9dc973a909e411dbec6a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <eb1b2cfa58cddc44c92c3a87a0e0a6c4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100923103802.GA16984@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | RoundCube Webmail/0.2-beta |
> Yes, that could very well possible. While I'm not an expert on iSER it > looks like it doesn't use the software crc32c checksums in iscsi over > TCP but relies on the RDMA protocols guaranteeing it. that would explain quite a lot actually. Thanks for the hint. > Btw, what target do you use? According to > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-stgt/msg02038.html it seems like the > stgt iser target has some issues that look quite similar to yours. we're using tgt which might have a similar problem. As even IB over TCP is several times faster than our disks, we will now proceed w/o iSER to have the system running and then experiment with iSER on a test system. thanks, -Christian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: force background CIL push under sustained load, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Problem with file system on iSCSI FileIO, Slawomir Nowakowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS errors on large Infiniband fileserver setup, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS errors on large Infiniband fileserver setup, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |