| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/16] xfs: split inode AG walking into separate code for reclaim |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:28:05 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1285137869-10310-12-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1285137869-10310-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1285137869-10310-12-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:44:24PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The reclaim walk requires different locking and has a slightly > different walk algorithm, so separate it out so that it can be > optimised separately. Yeah, the code was getting far too cruft already with all the conditionals. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 05/16] xfs: rename xfs_buf_get_nodaddr to be more appropriate, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 12/16] xfs: implement batched inode lookups for AG walking, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 11/16] xfs: split inode AG walking into separate code for reclaim, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/16] xfs: split inode AG walking into separate code for reclaim, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |