[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Now: Debian issues, WAS: XFS Filesystem not mounting

To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Now: Debian issues, WAS: XFS Filesystem not mounting
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:32:01 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C8FB8D6.6080603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <29704010.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100914012151.GF411@dastard> <29705139.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009140740.14482@xxxxxx> <20100914082504.4109712d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <29708085.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009141603.24754@xxxxxx> <4C8F9E29.2000803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <29710491.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C8FB8D6.6080603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:03:02 -0500 vous écriviez:

> > ;-)  That makes a huge difference.  But generally my experience
> > thus far with debian has been positive.  Enough to make me consider
> > switching.   And I know the XFS has never given me a lick of
> > trouble.  
> I've only been using XFS for about a year now, and I've had zero
> problems. 

I've used XFS only since 1996 and never looked back - I
still actually miss those sturdy Origin 200 and 2000 :) I've set up
about 2.5 PB of XFS filesystems in the past 5 years so I think it's
quite a significant metric.

On the other hand I had some problems (fortunately nothing
irremediable) on reiser, ext3 though I used them only sparsely.
Obviously XFS is much more resilient to hardware glitches (I even
recovered most of the data from a RAID-0 array with a failed drive).

Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>