xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Filesystem not mounting

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS Filesystem not mounting
From: pbrunnen <PBrunnen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <4C8F9E29.2000803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <29704010.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100914012151.GF411@dastard> <29705139.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009140740.14482@xxxxxx> <20100914082504.4109712d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <29708085.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009141603.24754@xxxxxx> <4C8F9E29.2000803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Stan,


Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 
> I've been using Debian for headless servers for many years.
> Distribution upgrades via apt-get or aptitude have been smooth and easy
> for many years.  I have one server that's been in-place upgraded from
> Woody through Lenny with only minor dependency issues--that's 4
> distribution upgrades over 5 years--Woody, Sarge, Etch, Lenny.
> 

Part of my reasoning for looking towards debian is because I was forced into
it about two years ago.  I manage a solution for one of my company partners
which is based on etch with backported kernels.  There are many things I
like about it... and I agree on the clean upgrade path and very good package
management.

But the downsides to debian have been holding me back...
1) I miss yast.  aptitude is just not the same.
2) Vendor support is officially non-existant.  We are a Dell shop and
upgrading openmanage is a pain. With SuSE its download and go.
3) I understand the ideology and legal reasons debian removes firmware blobs
(broadcom anyone) from their kernel modules...  but this is always a real
pain.  I end up monkeying about with the initrd image to get the firmware
blobs in... and often I just recompile with the blobs and forget it.


Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 
> Then again, I don't use Debian kernels, so my kernels were never
> upgraded during the dist upgrade.  This may have prevented some
> headaches.  I roll my own kernels from kernel.org source and tend to
> keep fairly current.  So, when I do a dist upgrade my current kernel is
> usually newer than what the dist upgrade provides.  The fact I leave out
> features I don't need may play a role in preventing problems as well.
> 

;-)  That makes a huge difference.  But generally my experience thus far
with debian has been positive.  Enough to make me consider switching.   And
I know the XFS has never given me a lick of trouble.

*Didn't want to seem off topic.  Had to throw in the XFS reference at the
end.  lol.

Thanks again for everyone's input.
Its Much Appreciated!
-Cheers, Peter.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/XFS-Filesystem-not-mounting-tp29704010p29710491.html
Sent from the Xfs - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>