| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS defragmentation issue |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:45:30 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20100912104321.5529f74c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4C8A4395.5070702@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C8B27E4.2050102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100911082330.GG705@dastard> <4C8BDAC8.8010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100912104321.5529f74c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 |
Emmanuel Florac put forth on 9/12/2010 3:43 AM: > Le Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:38:48 -0500 vous écriviez: > >> That's good to know Dave. Thanks. I created a short-name script a >> while back with "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" merely so I could >> "clear the baffles" now and then. > > But isn't it somewhat risky? isn't there any risk of data loss by > dropping cache at any moment? From: http://linux-mm.org/Drop_Caches This is a non-destructive operation and will only free things that are completely unused. Dirty objects will continue to be in use until written out to disk and are not freeable. If you run "sync" first to flush them out to disk, these drop operations will tend to free more memory. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS defragmentation issue, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_fsr: use /proc/mounts if available, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS defragmentation issue, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS defragmentation issue, Roel van Meer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |