[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs mount/create options (was: XFS status update for August 2010)

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs mount/create options (was: XFS status update for August 2010)
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 01:30:15 +0200
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20100908145148.GB705@dastard>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <20100902145959.GA27887@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009081538.54488@xxxxxx> <20100908145148.GB705@dastard>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010 Dave Chinner wrote:
> Dynamically changing the RAID array geometry is a Bad Idea.  Yes,
> you can do it, but if you've got a filesystem full of data and
> metadata aligned to the old geometry then after the modification
> it won't be aligned anymore.
> If you want to do this, then either don't bother about geomtry hints
> in the first place, or dump, rebuild the array, mkfs and restore so
> everything is properly aligned with the new world order. Hell,
> dump/mkfs/restore might even be faster than reshaping a large
> array...
You're right. But there are some customers who don't want to spend the 
money for a 2nd array, and can't afford the downtime of backup, rebuild 
raid (takes 8-48 hours), restore. So an online upgrade is needed. We're 
not in an ideal world.

mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>