xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 4K drives, sectsz=512, bsize=4096

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 4K drives, sectsz=512, bsize=4096
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:01:34 +0200
In-reply-to: <201008300956.21264@xxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <201008300956.21264@xxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.35.4-zmi; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Montag, 30. August 2010 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Will there be any real difference if I re-format with sectsz=4096? 
> AFAIK, XFS will do I/O based on block size, so the sector size
>  doesn't  do any harm. Is that correct?
 
Nobody? Is my assumption correct that a change in sectsz from 512 to 
4096 would be of no difference for the filesystem?


-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>