| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Quota Check OOM |
| From: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100831144319.7e97acea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4C7BA0A0.5090202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CB0FE.1020302@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100831104418.058ab6b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CF4C4.9030105@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100831144319.7e97acea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
Oh we don't do this today. But it is a really old system where someone someday decided to do that. Sadly i can't change this... Stefan Am 31.08.2010 14:43, schrieb Emmanuel Florac: Le Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:25:40 +0200 vous écriviez:Disk Size: /dev/sda3 4.8T 2.7T 2.2T 55% /This is really very very weird. Why on earth would you use such a big root filesystem? It is extremely impractical and dangerous to store data on the root filesystem. Do you have any good reason not to have a small root filesystem and a distinct data one? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS Quota Check OOM, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Quota Check OOM, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS Quota Check OOM, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Quota Check OOM, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |