xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS Quota Check OOM

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS Quota Check OOM
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:56:40 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100831144319.7e97acea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4C7BA0A0.5090202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CB0FE.1020302@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100831104418.058ab6b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C7CF4C4.9030105@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100831144319.7e97acea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6

Oh we don't do this today. But it is a really old system where someone someday decided to do that. Sadly i can't change this...

Stefan

Am 31.08.2010 14:43, schrieb Emmanuel Florac:
Le Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:25:40 +0200 vous écriviez:

Disk Size:
/dev/sda3             4.8T  2.7T  2.2T  55% /

This is really very very weird. Why on earth would you use such a big
root filesystem? It is extremely impractical and dangerous to store
data on the root filesystem. Do you have any good reason not to have a
small root filesystem and a distinct data one?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>