On Montag, 16. August 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Why does "everyone" on this list "reply-to-all" when 99% of the time
> it is totally unnecessary, redundant, and potentially ruffles a
> sender's feathers, as in this case?
I'm also on several lists, but the only list where reply-to-all is used
is this one - so I followed the way it's done here without having
questioned why.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|