[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsdump-3.0.4 problems

To: Mario Bachmann <mbachman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsdump-3.0.4 problems
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:30:21 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100816182236.249a2a0f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100816182236.249a2a0f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:22:36PM +0200, Mario Bachmann wrote:
> Hello, 
> my kernel is
> Linux x2 #1 SMP Sun Aug 15 00:32:14 CEST 2010 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 
> 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
> I get a lot of Warnings with xfsdump-3.0.4 (booth, gentoo package 3.0.4-r1 
> and git-version):
> x2 ~/source/d/xfsdump/dump # ./xfsdump -l0 -L "Test" - /dev/sda2 |gzip - > 
> /mnt/data2/dump_text.gz
> ./xfsdump: WARNING: could not stat dirent .crack-attack ino 100663674: Das 
> Argument ist ungültig: using null generation count in directory entry

bulkstat is failing, indicating an invalid option was passed.

> With the "old" version xfsdump-3.0.1, I get no warnings!
> xfsdump -l0 -L "Test" - /dev/sda2 |gzip - > /mnt/data2/dump301_test.gz
> xfsdump: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy
> xfsdump: version 3.0.1 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-threaded
> xfsdump: Dump Status: SUCCESS
> And the file is 4,8 GB. All seems to be correct!

I can't see any changes between 3.0.1 and 3.0.4 that would explain
this. Did you run them on the same machine and kernel? Did you build
them with the same compiler? If everything is the same, then perhaps
you could bisect (only a few changes so should be quick) to point
out the offending change.


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>